le-sous-sol
Marc-Alain Ouaknin,
The Book burned philosophy of the Talmud
The Mahloquèt Talmudic be "transcendental dialectic" as the Other Man's dialogue is not a stylistic effect, the speaker has no role to highlight the speaker. The Mahloquèt first dialogue principle of the Talmud, is fundamentally linked to a certain conception of hermeneutics and truth.
this form of thought is a word whose mode keeps dynamic demand. It is, in our eyes, "speech issue," the issue.
The question, if it is unfinished floor, rests on the incompletion. It is not incomplete as a question, it is instead the word that the fact of incomplete reporting does. The issue puts the statement in a vacuum full, it enriches the previous vacuum. By the question, we give the thing and we give a vacuum that allows us not to have or even desire to have him thinking. "
Talmudic thought is a thought of the question, and certainly not by accident that the first word of the Talmud is just a question: Méématai : "From when? "
Rabbi Nachman of Breslov explains the interconnectedness of the space Mahloquèt proceeds from Hallalhapanoui necessary to creation. God retires, he leaves a "void" ( Hallal hapanoui ) which is essentially the original place of all the questions, because it contains within itself the question of questions: the Enigma!
Indeed God retires, so it is missing! But can there be something off of the vitality that breathes the divine? No! God is present. Yéch-vee- ayi ',' Being and nothingness "coexist in the same time. When two masters together to discuss the relationship proceeds of this paradox is this that called Bina. It's not about quality or intellectual ability, but a relational approach, dialogue must be maintained.
The fact that the same text can offer countless interpretations implies that there is no "correct" interpretation. This leads in fact to emerge from the binary logic of true and false (the Greek logic) to enter what we call the "logic of sense."
formula As well Nietzsche: "There are all sorts of eyes ... also, there are therefore all kinds of truths, and therefore there is no truth. To truly enter the Talmudic thought it necessary, whenever there is asserted a certainty, seek opposite statement with certainty that this is related. Talmudic thought, well, continues to oppose, and never be satisfied with itself, never, either, be satisfied with this opposition.
this form of thought is a word whose mode keeps dynamic demand. It is, in our eyes, "speech issue," the issue.
"The question is movement. In the simple grammatical structure of the query, we already feel this opening speech questions; there is demand for something else; incomplete, the word that says it questioned is a part. So the question is essentially partial, it is the place where the floor is still unfinished gives ...
The question, if it is unfinished floor, rests on the incompletion. It is not incomplete as a question, it is instead the word that the fact of incomplete reporting does. The issue puts the statement in a vacuum full, it enriches the previous vacuum. By the question, we give the thing and we give a vacuum that allows us not to have or even desire to have him thinking. "
Rabbi Nachman of Breslov explains the interconnectedness of the space Mahloquèt proceeds from Hallalhapanoui necessary to creation. God retires, he leaves a "void" ( Hallal hapanoui ) which is essentially the original place of all the questions, because it contains within itself the question of questions: the Enigma!
Indeed God retires, so it is missing! But can there be something off of the vitality that breathes the divine? No! God is present. Yéch-vee- ayi ',' Being and nothingness "coexist in the same time. When two masters together to discuss the relationship proceeds of this paradox is this that called Bina. It's not about quality or intellectual ability, but a relational approach, dialogue must be maintained.
0 comments:
Post a Comment